Monday, October 19, 2020

問題翻譯 2.0

香港政府推出「抗疫基金」,為受COVID影響的企業和市民提供援助,「抗疫基金」英文竟然直譯為「Anti-Epidemic Fund」。不懂中文的朋友起初以為是為醫護界提供額外資源,務求儘快遏止病毒蔓延,又或者是為香港生物科技業界提供資金,加速研製疫苗。但香港並無研發疫苗的機構,大學也只是與某些內地和海外研究團隊合作而已,何來Anti-Epidemic 的 Fund?

Anti-Epidemic 明顯是「抗-疫」的直譯, 先有中,後譯英。問題是,有關政策局和行政部門精英雲集,竟無人察覺,讓如此垃圾翻譯出街,非常搞笑!美國類似基金叫「COVID-19 Relief Fund」,語義非常清晰,字眼是 relief,目標自然是為紓緩市民大眾因疫情所遭受的經濟困境而提供的援助。除了Anti-Epidemic 本身的意譯誤差,執行翻譯的官員的基本事實查證也欠妥,世衛在港府推出「抗疫基金」之前已老早宣布 COVID-19 成為全球大流行,本來的 Epidemic 已升級為 Pandemic,就算是誤譯也應該是 Anti-Pandemic Fund 才錯得對,現在乃錯上錯!

幾年前寫過兩篇關於香港的問題翻譯的博文1,2,主要是中譯的問題,是先英後中所牽涉的技術問題和文化差異產生的誤譯。現在剛剛相反,進化為問題翻譯 2.0!


2020年10月19日

______________
1 博士候選人:你幾時去參選?
2 從航機廣播看中國人的自信

Wednesday, September 30, 2020

《麥路人》

不少香港人對露宿者的印象都不外乎是一群無依無靠和「窮到窿」的不幸人口, 沒深究他們背後的故事。如果你也是這樣想,「麥路人」這齣電影將改變你對露宿者的態度,更令你反思人生的無常, 以及人與人之間莫名其妙的關係。

劇中最早出場的年輕人,首先說明世上沒有不勞而獲, 不長進、不努力,就絕對不會有回報。這也許是大家廣為接受的真理,但反過來問,付出了努力就必能得到回報嗎?* 劇中的媽媽帶著女兒於麥記借宿,雖然已盡了一切努力,卻不獲半點回報,甚至厄運接二連三的降臨在她身上。所謂「種瓜得瓜」恐怕只是人們一廂情願以為好心必有好報的虛假邏輯,世事又豈能盡如人意! 婆媳關係素以糾紛居多,何以媳婦自願替婆婆還債?稍有常識的導演都不應該犯如此低級錯誤,劇中展現媳婦對婆婆的反常無私奉獻顯然是導演刻意安排,令觀眾反思人際關係的多元性,不可一概而論。

郭富城的遭遇卻反映人生的無常,錯過了機會,抱憾終身,一直未能放下心中的包袱,到了生命盡頭未敢與母親相見。萬梓良拒絕接受妻子離去的事實,極端的内咎改變了他本來仍可快樂過活的人生軌跡,是郭富城的影子角色,兩人的命運同是被「心債」重重的壓著,無法解脫。郭富城喚醒了萬梓良,自己卻執迷不悟。而張達明這位最佳配角,在鏡頭下展現的潦倒和滄桑,卻說明世事無絕對這個道理,他面對絕境,走投無路,最後諷刺地在獄中如願以償,倒可算是兩餐溫飽。

楊千嬅在戲裡多次唱出梅艷芳的首本名曲「心債」的首段,「重重心中癡債,原是欠下你一世,無限無盡愛在我心底」。想到生命的反覆無常和生活的咄咄逼人,殘酷的現實不讓你付出的努力獲得報答,心裡湧起了莫名的感慨,為何「明明用盡了努力,明明事事都不計,為什麼萬般癡心,都等如枉費」!也許命運就是如此!

2020年9月30日

________________
*按邏輯學來說,「沒有A就沒有B」不等於「有A就有B」。

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

政府能否洞悉全民檢測的信息?


自新冠肺炎疫情爆發以來,香港政府一直忽視科學防控,檢測率偏低,疫情一波接一波的出現,一波比一波的嚴重。

最需要增強檢測率的是每一波疫情的早、中期,大量檢測可以及早找出隱形帶菌者引起的傳播暗鏈,這是有科學依據的。但當確診數目降至單位數字,隱形帶菌者比例亦已大幅下降,明顯已經錯失了全民檢測的最佳時機。政府卻排除專業意見,一廂情願預算幾百萬人會接受檢測,揚言能找出1500隱形患者。最新數字顯示,從106萬的已檢測案例中,只找到16個懷疑隱形患者,即一百萬分之十五(0.0015%)。

「全民自願檢測計畫」在效益最低之際推出,令人莫名其妙!被傳媒追問所需成本時,政府避而不談,只強調是獲中央幫助,有常識的都知道乃天文數字**!令市民大為反感的是全民檢測在各區設立檢測站,操作方式實際上與立法會選舉無異。政府以疫情為由,提早宣布取消9月初的選舉,不予任何討論餘地,明顯是為要部署改變選舉的遊戲規則,推倒原有的制度。政府一方面取消選舉,同時又進行全民檢測,強調中央助港抗疫之殊遇,政策的反邏輯和時間錯配引來市民的極度反感。加上一班愚不可及的建制人士,指控不參與檢測的市民為「非良好市民」,提倡懲罰缺席「自願檢測」的市民,刺激更多本來中立的市民加入抵制的行列,一來一回是典型公關災難。

市民對今次全民檢測的反應冷淡,也是對政府未來施政的警示!自去年6月,香港政府跟六成香港人對立(以去年區選的64比例計算),而元朗721、太子831 等事件,過程被傳媒廣泛披露,於無數網上視頻亦清晰可見,仇口之大,傷痕之深,短期內無法修復。在這種敵對的情形下,政府雖獲國安法寶,可震懾示威活動,壓制反對言論,甚至趁機把反對派連根拔起,但很難消除市民對政府政策的戒心,而選擇留港的市民採取消極態度是唯一出路。

在現時極度政治化的環境下,市民對任何具爭議性的政策支持與否都必然成為變相公投。今次全民檢測,以目前的數字推算,估計最終大概150萬人參與,僅人口的兩成,數據從不騙人,大家可以藉此推算人心所向!


2020年9月8日


_________________
** 港府於9月15日公布「全民自願檢測計畫」花費5.3億港元,當中大概3.7億為支付包括內地醫護人員費用。

Sunday, August 9, 2020

淨化傳媒關鍵一步

香港政府無論是97前或97後,從來沒有搜查過任何傳媒機構,這是保障新聞自由的重要規範,港府一直堅守這基本原則。直至今天,香港政府終於以涉嫌違反國安法拘捕壹傳媒創辦人黎智英和機構的主要負責人,並大肆搜查壹傳媒大樓。

壹傳媒旗下的蘋果日報和壹週刊素來以反權貴、反建制作為新聞主線,雖然報導時有偏頗失實,但不少政府的敗政和大財團的舞弊也是蘋果率先披露。在保障人民知情權的前提下,壹傳媒絕對有其存在價值。在這個敏感時刻,壹傳媒的存在就是香港在中共治下還能享有多少自由的重要指標。

一個傳媒機構,沒有飛機大砲,用筆來監管政府,即使報導手法偏激,令政府和個別官員感到不快和尷尬,也不外乎是「言論」而已,可讓讀者自行判斷。在自由國家,任何傳媒機構都必定受到法律保障,包括反對政府的。

對中共而言,香港雖然是有利於經濟發展,但渴求民主和自由的意識形態是毒瘤,直接影響政權的安全係數!在一黨治國的制度下,反對聲音必須及早杜絕,以免危害「國家」安全,控制媒體是不容有失的,而這個媒體毒瘤必須徹底剷除,更需要及時制止任何反對力量的萌生,以免星星之火,後患無窮!相反,對於一個民主國家來說,政府是人民選出來的,政府不等於國家,根本不存在什麼顛覆的行為。不少美國人憎恨現屆政府,也不等於他們不愛國。要顛覆特朗普政府,美國人只需要利用手上的一票,就可以合法地改變政府。

可惜的是香港人眼白白的看著自己的地方,從極度開放文明,曾經享有高度言論自由,短短幾年間淪落如斯境地!反對或認真監測政府施政的媒體將會陸續消失,剩下來的都是當權者的資訊發佈機器,或少許無傷大雅的批評聲音(所謂「小鬧大幫忙」的造馬民主派)。配合教育政策對中、小學教師的整頓及全方位的「國民教育」,香港未來可望進一步與內地融合,新一代港人將更投入愛國、愛黨的高尚情操。


2020年8月9日

Friday, July 31, 2020

Dramatic Moment in "The Crown" Season 2


In the Netflix series The Crown season 2*, one whole episode is devoted to the true story of Lord Altrincham who helped the British monarchy survive by publishing his thoughts on Queen Elizabeth II and openly criticising her and her courtiers of being outdated and irrelevant. Sixty years have passed and the story represented one of the most dramatic moments that influenced the centuries old institution. The monarchy still survives, and the British majority seem to be proud of the coexistence of, and are well aware of the distinction between, the executive who actually administers the country and the Queen who serves only a titular role.

For audience here in Hong Kong, the most dramatic scene in the episode was probably when the Queen candidly arranged herself to meet with Lord Altrincham and to listen to his critical and relentless views against herself. Given it was 60 years ago, the Queen's status was supreme, and she had all the reasons (and power) to ignore any unlikable comments or even to mute them off completely! But the Queen eventually accepted all the "stops" and "starts" proposed by Lord Altrimcham, and created a whole new era in the history of the British monarchy. This story, well documented in the British news archive, demonstrated the magical power of the Queen's willingness to listen to comments, however critical and unwelcome, in winning the hearts of people. Moreover, most of us here would be tempted to compare what would happen to Lord Altrimcham if he were in China or Hong Kong now! Would he be loyal or stupid enough to publish his open comments against the nation's leader even if the comments were for the good of his nation? If he would, his only fate would be to spend the rest of his life behind bars. The reality is that no Lord Altrincham would ever exist in China, and neither would his journal or any media that don't dance to the leader's tune. The root cause, as we can clearly see, is the lack of an effective mutual control and an open accountable system that are necessary for a nation to advance in a world that increasingly shares the values of freedom and democracy.


July 31, 2020

_________________
*The Crown Season 2 – Netflix

Tuesday, July 21, 2020

Cause and effect can't be reversed!

Anyone who has some common sense would have felt very frustrated in the past one year hearing all the nonsenses from our highly paid officials. How can one be not offended when the top administrator, who receives an undeservingly high salary, could not even distinguish a cause from its effect, or a decision from an outcome as a consequence of it.

Our CE said, in defending her belated decisions in rolling out sub-optimal disease control measures, the "6-month long" fight against the virus was very well managed and delicately balanced with due consideration of our economy and other societal activities. Looks like she was very proud of her half-arsed policy that has kept us in this state for 6 months, and she knew it would take this long!

So, she was correct in delaying the border closure until early March; she was correct in allowing infinite number of people to gather indoor in support of restaurant business in June; she was so so correct in allowing 50,000+ people to travel in and out of HK unchecked in the past couple of months; she was also correct in delaying work-from-home arrangement of civil servants for a week (against her advisors' advice Monday last week). All these appeared convincing only to her blind supporters!

Anyone with an ability to think should know that the present is the outcome of past events, plus other factors of course. Didn't she know that the "6-month long fight" was the outcome? We didn't have to fight for 6 months if she agreed to implement more drastic measures earlier, and keep the measures in place.


July 21, 2020

Sunday, July 12, 2020

上蒼的默示

讀小學時,神父跟我們講道,說只要你細心聆聽天主給你的訊息,回應祂的指示,祂必會眷顧你!當時覺得神父講的太深奧了,從來沒有聽到天主跟我說話,所以沒甚麼感覺。現在人大了,卻對此話深信不疑!所謂冥冥中自有安排,可能是造物對我們的一種賞賜,回報我們相信和履行祂的旨意!

看看過去一年在香港發生的事,嘗試逆天而行的,上蒼都給他警告訊號。誰真心假意的說是為了香港好,不讓香港成為逃犯天堂,上蒼就賜予你成為超級逃犯天堂的最有利條件(終斷美、英、加、澳和你一早訂下的引渡協議)!誰主張禁蒙面的,就偏要給你天天戴上口罩;但上蒼沒有即時譴責,還放你一馬,從去年9月開始,讓你最痛恨的社會運動暗助你減低九成訪港遊客。12月至1月期間,大型活動的主辦單位諷刺地以「示威者可能威脅公眾安全」為由,取消了近60場紅館騷和公眾活動,冥冥中在關鍵時刻,正當病毒靜悄悄但猛烈地蔓延時,把香港從極危險的疫情中拯救出來!試想,按前年12月至1月期間的一千多萬訪港旅客計算,年初香港的第一波疫情應該嚴重千倍,成千上萬的個案在所難免!幸乎!上天真的眷顧了我們,還給予如此清晰的訊息!

這幾天的感染數字再度飆升,上天又一次訓示我們要做好該做的事。現在政府全副精神投入中國模式的國安,上天給你重要提示,你卻充耳不聞!甚麼才是該做的事?「香港書展」本週三(三天後)開幕,將是鑽石公主號的翻版。打個五折來計算,假定五萬人入場,在室內環境逗留數小時,共用設施、廁所,並頻頻觸摸商品,假若當中十分之一的參與者沒有嚴格遵守防疫規定,其中十分之一由於隱形帶菌者而受到感染,再帶回家居和社區,以一傳三的比例傳播開去。書展過後,將會有1500人以上確診,繼而有更多人受感染!

上天給我們的信息不只在於疫情的反覆,細心聆聽,仔細分析,誰是誰非也不難判斷。若不懸崖勒馬,一場浩劫勢必降臨!

2020年7月12日


Wednesday, June 24, 2020

National Security is Mandatory to Every Nation! Why Double Standard?

This is seemingly the most logical question any pro-establishment politician or member of the pro-government camp would put to the untamed anti-everything-China yellow camp. True, the US and other western countries all have their national security laws. So, why are you applying a different standard to your own country?

But if you put the implementation of national security in the Chinese context, applying a double standard could be fully legitimate and even necessary. Track records of law enforcement in China have already proven how violation of national security laws can be a wild-card allegation for anyone who challenges the central leadership, and how far the way trials are conducted in a Chinese court is from the civilized world, not to mention the candid trials and deprivation of rights to properly defend against the allegation. The independence of the judicial system is not even questionable; it simply does not exist in China as the judicial system is supposed to serve and collaborate with the government. It is not difficult to understand the rationale behind choosing specific judges by the chief executive to handle cases brought by the new security legislation and how unimportant the perception of conflict of interest is for China. (Some people would have deliberately confused the titular role of the chief executive in appointing judges with choosing judges for trials.) Ignoring these fundamental differences, one has no basis on which to discuss whether the same standard is applicable to assess even the reasonableness of establishing and implementing the same Chinese national security law in Hong Kong.

When a US citizen criticizes the government, chants anti-government slogans, or demands the president to step down, he does not violate any national security law. But when a Chinese citizen does the same, he can be prosecuted for "endangering national security" or "inciting subversion of state power", and the conviction rate is 99%. The root difference is that an American can vote the government out, but a Chinese must accept the government or he will face prosecution. Environmentalist Tan Zuoren, who advocated an inquiry into the substandard school buildings causing deaths of hundreds of students during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, was sentenced to 5 years in prison for "inciting subversion of state power". Food safety worker Zhao Lianhai, who was also the father of one of the many victims of the melamine-tainted milk products, was sentenced to 2½ years imprisonment for "disturbing social order". Human rights lawyer Huang Quanzhang was held incommunicado (virtually disappeared) for three years since August 2015 and was put on trial for the wild-card allegation of "subversion of state power" in August 2018, and released in April 2020. The case of Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo needs no elaboration, he was convicted for making a political reform proposal. None of these cases, from arrest, trial to conviction, was compliant with western standards.

Double standard or not? It's up to you to judge!


June 24, 2020

________________ PS: All discussions now will remain purely academic, as the new national security laws will be implemented anyway, and the only hope we have is the reduced level of arbitrariness and better transparency under the common law system if trials were still allowed to be conducted in a Hong Kong court.

Wednesday, May 13, 2020

海洋公園能浪子回頭嗎?

海洋公園的故事就像一齣老套粵語片,一個人貪慕虛榮、樂而忘本的典型收場。我們的海洋公園40多年來,憑著以海洋生態環境保育為本位,扮演自然教育的角色,培養不少本地海洋環保人才,贏得不少讚譽。中學時每次到海洋公園參觀水母館、鯊魚館、水族館都感到興奮,十幾年前依然購買家庭年票支持公園,當時也沒有多少遊客,公園還是可以維持營運。

這幾年,海洋公園瘋狂擴張,見錢開眼,大搞酒店、娛樂餐飲設施,轉型為專注招呼大陸遊客的公園,續漸脫離本位,教育次要,本地人不再入園。嗚呼哀哉!今天終於窮途末路,到立法會向納稅人討53億來償還債務和寧養一年,好讓它找個方法起死回生或等待奇蹟的出現。從感情出發,海洋公園這個不肖子還是要救的,但他能否浪子回頭,從新定位就不存厚望了!

在歐洲,重點文化教育景點不會因為遊客多而瘋狂擴大,只會跟你說「Sorry! Today's quota is full!」只有粗鄙的遊客景點才會不顧一切的迎合遊客口味,務求賓至如歸,他們的定位就是生意至上,無可厚非。但我們的海洋公園應該是這樣的嗎?


2020年5月13日

Thursday, March 12, 2020

WHO's Anti-logic

Donald Trump announces today that he will close all US borders with Europe except UK for the next 30 days in response to the threats of a severe outbreak of the New Coronavirus disease. Closing borders has proven effectiveness in cutting off the transmission chains of this contagious disease. Taiwan was the first to shut its borders completely with China including Hong Kong and Macau, and has so far remained relatively unaffected by the virus. Many countries have also partially closed their borders with China and other regions where an outbreak is known to occur.

Contagion always has a spreading end and a receiving end. If you're infected, you become a spreader and you should quarantine yourself to reduce the chance of infecting other people, or at least wear a mask. That's a responsible thing to do. But if you're healthy and wear a mask, you are protecting yourself against possible infection. Extending this logic to a national level, however, we only saw countries close their borders to protect themselves against inbound transmission, but there is not a single responsible nation who has closed its borders to prevent outbound transmission, which is what infected individuals are asked to do. Even more regretful is the irresponsible coercion to make other countries not to cut access when you knew you had an outbreak, using some totally irrelevant excuses such as racial discrimination claims or just being unkind (不厚道1—a shameful remark by a nation's spokesman). Of course the real motivation could be economical, or a narrow-minded national pride mentality, or simply selfishness.

The worst among all is the behavior of WHO, who is supposed to stand on the side of protecting people's health but had chosen to play down the situation at the early phase of the outbreak in China, and even advised countries to be cautious about making travel bans that would promote racial discrimination. Despite racial discrimination being none of WHO's business, such advice issued at the early outbreak stage was totally inappropriate and definitely not helpful in containing the virus. Instead, what WHO should and ought to do was to advise its member nations to quarantine themselves (shutting their own borders) should an outbreak occur.

The world is doomed as a result of the poor judgement of WHO and the apparent political bias of the leadership. After these few months, we clearly see the ugliness of the "big" nations, and we also know we should not take WHO's advice seriously if you still wish to survive with good health!


March 12, 2020

_________________1回應美國提升中國旅遊警示 華春瑩:美國實在太不厚道」— Citizen News, February 1, 2020

Thursday, January 30, 2020

Will Hong Kong be in for a severe outbreak?

A novel coronavirus began to spread from Wuhan in December 2019, and now infected cases are confirmed in almost every province in China; and in the past 10 days has flown to other Asian countries and across the Pacific as well, with over 7000 people infected globally so far. Hong Kong has imported 10 cases via its many ports directly bordering with the mainland. Though Hong Kong people are vigilant of the outbreak, the painful memory of SARS has created tremendous stress and fear. The question is: will Hong Kong repeat history and be in for another severe outbreak?

Here is my quick and crude analysis, based on limited data

Data

From 22/1 to 29/1, the number of confirmed cases in HK grew from 0 to 10.

  • 23/1 +2 cases, total=2

  • 24/1 +3 cases, total=5

  • 26/1 +3 cases, total=8

  • 29/1 +2 cases, total=10

Model

My model is based on the simple rationale that new cases are related to existing cases, both within HK and imported from Wuhan. To keep it simple, I assume the bigger Wuhan area being the entire mainland. So, for Hong Kong, it is sufficient to assume just Hong Kong-Wuhan(=Mainland) interaction. So, how fast our number grows depends on

1. our own number

2. Wuhan’s number

3. recovery rate (awareness, protection, etc)

Yes, this is essentially a simplified "SIR" model*, as the academics used to call it. So, I am just pulling out the following simple equation, assuming that the incubation period is 10 days, i.e., in any day, people who can infect you are actually 10 times more than the infected number because they do not have symptom in the first ~10 days after being infected. This is just

RateHK(t) = αHK * (10) * NHK + βHK * τHK * 10 * NWγ * (NHK+NW)

where

  • RateHK(t) = rate of increase of infected cases, i.e., number of new cases per day;

  • NHK = number of infected cases in HK;

  • NW = number of infected cases in Wuhan (mainland);

  • α, β = infection rates;

  • γ = recovery rate;

  • τ = traffic factor (with this parameter, I can extend the model to other cities of the entire China).

Or equivalently, by redefining parameters for simplicity's sake (only for HK anyway), we have

RateHK(t) = ΑHK * NHK + ΒHK * NWΓ * (NHK+NW)

Now, filling in the past data (limited though), the average rates in 22-23/1, 23-24/1 and 24-26/1 are

  • RateHK(ave) = 2 = ΑHK * 2 + ΒHK * 4000 – ΓHK * 0.05 * 4002

  • RateHK(ave) = 3 = ΑHK * 5 + ΒHK * 4500 – ΓHK * 0.1* 5005

  • RateHK(ave) = 1.5 = ΑHK * 8 + ΒHK * 6000 – ΓHK * 0.5 * 6008

The factor 0.05, 0.1 and 0.5 in the third term is to adjust the society’s awareness of self-protection that retards the transmission rate. At the beginning, awareness was very poor in the mainland, I would say 0.05 as the factor of awareness that reduces the recovery rate. Then, in later few days, people get better educated, say being improved to 0.1. Then, at the latest time, I assume that most are vigilant, hence 0.5. This factor is necessary unless we make alpha and beta time-varying to address the same effect.

Solving the equations from the data, we get ΑHK = 0.405, ΒHK = 0.0003782, and ΓHK = 0.0016.

Prediction

So, here we go (assuming full awareness of self-protection):

RateHK = 0.405 NHK + 0.0003782 NW – 0.0016 * 1.0 * (NHK+NW)

Just a bit of nasty arithmetics, averaging over next 30 days, NHK should be adjusted to NHK(now) + RateHK*15. So, the next 30 days, we have

RateHK = 0.405 (NHK(now)+RateHK*15) + 0.0003782 NW – 0.0016 * 1.0 * (NHK(now)+RateHK*15+NW)

Assume Wuhan’s outbreak continues in the next 4 weeks. Let’s speculate 3 scenarios, depending on the mainland situation and assuming that our borders remain opened (at least our CE had insisted it be so).

  1. WORST: For extreme outbreak, let NW = 100000 average in Feb.

  2. POOR: For severe outbreak, let NW = 50000 average in Feb

  3. HOPEFUL: If outbreak in Wuhan (mainland) is under control, let NW = 10000 average in Feb.

PREDICTION of Rate_HK for next 30 days:

  1. WORST: RateHK = 15 cases per day

  2. POOR: RateHK = 7 cases per day

  3. HOPEFUL: RateHK = 0 cases per day (as RateHK < 0)

Conclusion

I don't have enough data to establish a confidence level. Perhaps somewhere between HOPEFUL and POOR is the most likely event, as the mainland number continues to soar over 10,000!

I must also confess that I did not consider the contact network and individual behavior in the above analysis. So, not perfect though, still I would say they aren't completely unreasonable estimates.


30 January 2020


__________________*M. Small, P. Shi and C. K. Tse, "Plausible Models for Propagation of the SARS Virus," IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences, vol. E87-A, no. 9, pp. 2379-2386, September 2004.M. Small, C. K. Tse, and D.M. Walker, "Super-spreaders and the rate of transmission of the SARS virus," Physica D, vol. 215, pp. 146-158, March 2006.

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

「大樂必易」:滄海一聲笑與 Joy to the World

黃霑在憶述他為電影《笑傲江湖》配樂時,說導演徐克要求他譜寫主題曲, 並指定主題曲必須配合電影中的一幕講及兩個武林高手(曲洋、劉正風)與令狐沖在船上即興創奏出來的樂曲。出自高手的必定是偉大的音樂,黃霑絞盡腦汁寫了好幾首給徐克,都不獲接受,最後黃霑從古書《樂志》中的一句「大樂必易」得到了靈感!

中國最古老的音樂旋律基本上只有五個音階,即是 宮、商、角、徵、羽(do、re、mi、so、la),黃霑就直接將五個音階從高到低依序排下來,la---so-mi--re--do--,mi---re-do--La--So--,就這樣寫出了「滄海一聲笑,滔滔兩岸潮」,然後,再由低至高、高至低隨便反覆的滑行幾次,就這樣完成了這首在中、港、台都極為流行的經典名曲。

聖誕節期間,聽到收音機播出耳熟能詳的 "Joy to the World",此曲是公認的經典,幾乎地球上每個角落都有當地語言的版本,中文版叫「普世歡騰」。細心聆聽,發現 "Joy to the World, the Lord is come" 的旋律跟「滄海一聲笑」有異曲同工之妙。C 大調八個音階從高到低依序排列, do--ti--la-so--- fa-mi--re--do,然後,旋律照樣由低至高、高至低隨意反覆滑行!"Joy to the World" 同樣是「大樂必易」的經典例子!


2020年1月8日


Recent Popular Post